How to Use Go to Optimize the Cost of Development

Big companies are often dependant on software systems to support complex purposes ranging from project management to human resource objectives. Many of these businesses understand why powerful software tools make a significant difference in accomplishing such critical tasks. Yet they aren’t as knowledgeable concerning specific programming languages like Golang and its ability to streamline their overall functions. Therefore, companies such as Sphere Software can help educate corporate managers on Go’s capacity for a wide array of development responsibilities.

The process of writing and maintaining large software systems is often a challenge, especially whenever team members change. But Go has the capacity to diminish these risks through safeguards that protect the language while simplifying its functions to create a more manageable learning curve for entry level developers. Additionally, Go has the built-in advantage of addressing ineffective, complicated code while adapting the codebase at the same time. In a nutshell, this means that Go makes it easier for you to bring new developers into an existing project. By taking advantage of its numerous strengths, your company can minimize certain complications within projects and bring down the cost of development.

Determining the Rules

Before you decide to extend your core team, a new set of rules needs to be designed to reduce the supervision expenses. Simultaneously, integral guarantees have to be in place so that the project isn’t damaged during this process.

One of Go’s most appealing features concerning development teams, whether new or established, is that the language specifically prevents the writing of ineffectual code. This unified code formatting inhibits the potential for “creativity” that could impair readability. Therefore, you have the ability to assign and reassign modules to developers dynamically. That means members of your staff won’t need as much time to catch up with the work performed by another individual.

Scaling the Team with Efficiency

To be sure, the market of new Go developers is increasing simply because of the high rate of adoption in the industry. Furthermore, development specialists who are not as familiar with Golang are motivated to learn this programming language to stay informed about technological advances. Still, it is a challenge to find qualified people for the software development industry.

Fortunately, though, one of Go’s most impressive economical advantages is that it encourages more involvement without requiring developers to start from the very beginning. This makes the Go language specification compact. In fact, the official definitive guide to the language, Effective Go, can be learned within a week’s time or less1. Developers with experience in backend methodology may expect this adaptation to take approximately two weeks or, in rare circumstances, up to one month.

Because of Go’s malleable design, it doesn’t matter how well this language is mastered prior to work. That’s because it can be learned onsite within the domain of a project. Also, further usage and qualifications have more to do with the developer’s computer science background and overall competence than the programming language the individual utilizes.

In many situations, companies hire junior to mid-level developers in order to assign them modules that match their experience. The entry requirements for this kind of work is often set low, the code environment is nearly sandboxed and it’s always supervised. Additionally, the complexity is minimized to around 10% by concealing common pieces within the framework. When a developer focuses on the code, becomes familiar with the problem domain and masters the framework implementation details, this individual will acquire the necessary expertise to move forward with Golang. Therefore, it’s feasible to be promoted in terms of responsibility and salary.

It is an effective strategy to grow professionals within a team. By using this approach, the risks are reduced since your company isn’t giving beginners excessive access to intellectual property and other key materials. In addition, there are also certain assurances that the code won’t destabilize the system or randomly escalate complexity. At the same time, new team members can learn Go with plenty of room for professional growth. Someday, they might even be given specific responsibilities from the core. And the core itself is protected because if one or more crucial members of the team leave, project maintenance can be assigned to existing members without causing chaos. Since these developers worked on simpler tasks first, while operating indirectly with the core, they had the chance to learn the rules.

Conclusion

Writing and maintaining large software systems can be a challenge, but the process gets more difficult any time a team has been changed. This can happen either when the development is accelerated with the addition of new people or when the cost of development is reduced by reassigning certain team members from the project. Unfortunately, many companies don’t consider these options. So software is often constructed as if all team members are on equal levels of experience and engagement.

But by taking full advantage of Go’s strengths, this programming language can simultaneously improve a system’s performance and simplify code maintenance. Moreover, companies that apply Go may organize the system and the corresponding team in a way that makes sure it can be scaled from a linear perspective. Work can then be delegated among members, which then simplifies the hiring and teaching protocols for new people without putting your business at risk. In addition, this method preserves the project by providing a reliable fallback if some key members leave before it is completed. When company leaders and CTOs maximize Go’s powerful design, they experience the value of this language’s simplified structure while also significantly diminishing the potential of exorbitant costs of development.

End Notes

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion_of_control

Previous

Next